I had the (dis)pleasure of reading through an editorial from the
states biggest newspaper this morning (The Courier Mail). Now don't get
me wrong usually I like reading the Courier as there is often some very
quality journalism that occurs....... Today: Not so.

After reading through columnist Paul Williams views on live export I was left considering where he got his facts from?
Comments such as this really got me a bit annoyed:
"Indeed, Europe is an interesting case. From exporting millions of live
head a decade ago, the continental trade has slowed to a trickle, and
will soon phase out altogether - all on the strength of changing public
opinion"
I
query Mr Williams, on this statement. Firstly yes Public Opinion does
have a terrific impact (as we have learned this year) but it would not
be the only underpinning factor. Considering where Europe is located
geographically in the world in comparison to the markets it supplies,
when you compare that to Australia and our geographic locale you will
discover the distance are a lot shorter for Australian exporters.
"Given the grief this trade has caused both sides of politics - remember
the 2003 debacle under John Howard when 57,000 live sheep were stranded
in the Middle East on the Cormo Express? - one would think that, even
for base political purposes, the major parties would seize every
opportunity to extricate themselves from a practice that causes acute
international embarrassment."
Mr
Williams then goes onto mention The Cormo Express debacle and the
impact that it had on Australian politics and the impact that it hard in
tarnishing Australia's reputation in the eyes of the world. Whilst this
situation was regrettable and upsetting and highly disappointing to
see. I would also mention that the Governments snap decision to ban live
exports this year left livestock producers in somewhat of a similar
situation. Producers running out of feed and unable to move livestock to
other markets, were moving to considering shooting them to prevent
suffering. If the Government were concerned about welfare in Indonesia,
they should have been equally concerned about the ramifications that
would have occurred as a result of this snap decision. Did they realise
what this would do when they were making an election campaign out of it?
"Opponents cited the usual arguments of the loss of a $1 billion
industry and local jobs as their defence to keep a cruel status quo.
But
neither has to be. First, when Australia exports live animals, we also
surrender Australian slaughterhouse jobs (not to mention valuable DNA
hard-won after years of controlled breeding).
Animals humanely stunned and slaughtered in Australia can be a jobs boon for the Northern Territory."
This
leads into Mr Williams closing remarks where he maintains that it would
be fine to see the cessation of an industry that contributes large
amounts to the economy, though in his defence he has stated that there
would be more jobs retained and profits by moving the processing
operations on-shore. Had Mr Williams listened fully to the opposing
parties rebuttal (from the ALP conference telecast which he has based
this article on), he would have found that the feasibility for setting
up a chilled meat processing division in Northern Australia is not
viable due to the wet season that occurs every year. There is a reason
why properties shut down or move to skeleton crews during this time as
the rain inundation that occurs makes most means of travel (bar air
services) unpassable.
The other point Mr Williams makes in this
article is that we are destroying sought after DNA bloodlines that have
been hard fought for. The cattle Live Export trade in itself would not
be sending genetically productive animals to sale and then onto meat
markets. The animals that are commonly sourced for these markets are
steers (castrated males = no genetic input to the herd) and animals that
are deemed non-productive (eg: Spayed Heifers/Non-Pregnant
Cows/Infertile Animals). Animals that are being exported overseas such
as Dairy Cattle are not being sent for the meat industry they are sent
for the purposes of genetic improvement in other herds overseas.
I
understand everyone's right an opinion, but what I don't agree with is
writing an opinion piece in a major Australian news paper without
researching the points being made in it.
You Can read the full article by Paul Williams
HERE